Psst…
A recent study showed that “there’s a fair bit of evidence that full RSS feeds reduce activity on a blog.” Read about the experiment and results at Cognitive Daily.
It’s funny how some people perceive the strength and authority of your degree based on WHERE you obtained it from, instead of WHAT you did, and HOW you did it. Like the following conversation that took place recently:
“It doesn’t matter to me, whether to do my Ph.D. locally, or overseas.”
“What do you mean, it doesn’t matter to you?! Why not take the opportunity to do it overseas? You don’t have to pay for it anyway.”
“Well, from WHERE I’ll be getting my Ph.D. is not as important as WHAT I’ll be doing, and WHO my Supervisors will be. I mean, it’s OK if I had to do it locally, I don’t mind it. What I’m trying to say is that it’s not *that* ultimately important that I do it somewhere far far away, that’s all.”
“Don’t be crazy, everybody wants to do their Ph.D. overseas. You’re short-changing yourself if you think of anything less than flying to a foreign soil to do it.”
“Well, I’ll keep my options open, I’m just saying that it isn’t a priority to me.”
So tell me, am I weird to NOT insist on pursuing my “higher education” overseas? With the government’s intention to increase the number of Ph.D. holders in the local universities by 2010, I foresee a lot of tutors or research fellows or lecturers with an M.Sc. being sent overseas. Which means a LOT of money will be spent on them (imagine paying an allowance to a student staying in the UK for 3 to 4 years, then multiply that with somewhere between 6 and 8, you do the math) — but that’s not what I should be worried about.
What I’d like to stress, in case you didn’t get it earlier, is that I’m not against the idea of doing my Ph.D. in the US or UK. In fact, if given the opportunity, I believe I’d be one of the first few who’d sign the papers. But that doesn’t mean that I’m willing to compromise on the subject matter of or the approach to my research.